Emergency lighting should be tested and reviewed by qualified technicians who have a thorough understanding of uk emergency lighting regulations.
Automatic emergency light testing.
The information is collated centrally allowing the facilities management or building management to collate the testing results.
A typical emergency light testing procedure is conducted as follows.
The first step of the test is to ensure occupants are made aware of upcoming darkness simulation to avoid panic and injuries.
Automatic testing of emergency lighting is the best way to meet fire safety order obligations and it will reduce the burden of testing emergency lighting installations.
The self testing emergency light is an affordable reliable and cost effective solution that performs all osha required tests automatically.
Notify occupants about emergency light testing.
Icel believes that automatic test systems ats are the best way of ensuring compliance with the required periodic testing and maintenance requirements.
Too many fms would say it has been longer than a month a risky answer.
Emergency lighting including exit signage is subject to a 30 second test every month and an annual 90 minute test to ensure that the system will function correctly in the event of an emergency.
An automatic emergency lighting testing system will automatically interrupt the mains power supply to a luminaire or a group of luminaires and detect that the emergency luminaire operates correct and upon reinstating the mains power supply it will ensure that the battery charges.
The results are displayed constantly by a series of led lights on the side of the unit just walk by and observe the functional status of the fixture it s that easy.
If the costs of an engineer s time and the disruption caused by manual testing are excessive self testing emergency lighting should be considered.
As well as providing confidence that emergency lighting is adequately tested to comply with bs en 5266 8 en 50172 and all local regulations automatic testing of emergency lighting can be shown to be more cost effective than manual testing for larger installations.
Different formats are available to match particular site requirements.